Medical malpractice panels and federal diversity jurisdiction: preserving access to federal courts by analyzing the nature of the panel.
نویسنده
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Administrative "health courts" for medical injury claims: the federal constitutional issues.
Our article analyzes whether the federal government may constitutionally supplant a traditional system of common-law trials before state judges and juries with new federal institutions designed by statute for compensating victims of medical injuries. Specifically, this article examines the federal constitutional issues raised by various proposals to replace traditional medical malpractice litig...
متن کاملA Descriptive Analysis of Medical Malpractice Insurance Premiums, 1974-1977
The rapid increase in medical malpractice insurance claims and concomitant increases in premiums in the early 1970's concerned the medical and government communities. In 1974 alone, there was a 195 percent increase in malpractice suits filed in State courts (Federal Medical Malpractice Insurance Act, 1975). Major efforts to understand the nature of the "crisis" and its potential solutions inclu...
متن کاملCaseload Burdens and Jurisdictional Limitations: Some Observations from the History of the Federal Courts
Judge Newman has asked that we talk not about him today but about the federal courts. Naturally, I will honor his request, but I must also say that I can think of no better place to start such a discussion than with the exceptionally valuable contributions he has made over the past two decades in examining the institutional problems that confront the federal courts and in proposing thoughtful a...
متن کاملThe Effect of Federalization on the Defense Function
he increasing federalization of crime gives rise to concurrent state and federal jurisdiction over most crimes. This dual jurisdiction enables prosecutors to choose whether to prosecute in state or federal courts. It is generally easier to obtain conviction in federal courts, and there is usually a large differential in the possible punishment under the different systems, with the federal syste...
متن کاملThe ghost that slayed the mandate.
Virginia v. Sebelius is a federal lawsuit in which Virginia has challenged President Obama's signature legislative initiative of health care reform. Virginia has sought declaratory and injunctive relief to vindicate a state statute declaring that no Virginia resident shall be required to buy health insurance. To defend this state law from the preemptive effect of federal law, Virginia has conte...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
- Cornell law review
دوره 66 2 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 1981